Retired after 40 years in business  

Used Equipment
Articles Written
Speeches Given
Tech Tips
Web Links
Radio History

   Articles for the Radio Broadcast Industry

Terms of Use & Disclaimer

Rebuild That Relic of an AM Transmitter
by Mark Persons
Radio World Article
October 19, 2011

(click thumbnail)
833A Tubes.

Many people think old AM transmitters are worthless.

If a high-level, plate-modulated tube transmitter is replaced by a shiny new solid-state transmitter, why should the old one be kept? Heck, you might get $500 for the relic.

Well, I am here to tell you that the new whiz-bang transmitter should be backed up by something that runs when trouble strikes.

One station owner told me the worst management decision he ever made was to get rid of his old transmitter after the new one arrived. He paid for that decision by being off the air for three days.

Solid-state transmitters need to see a 50-ohm load with little reactance in order to run properly. Old tube transmitters can run into a “coat hanger,” as many veteran engineers would say. If the AM antenna is misbehaving, a tube transmitter can be your savior while antenna repairs are made.

Most transmitters sold today are touted as being very reliable because a power amplifier module can fail and the transmitter will stay on the air at reduced power. That is fine until there is a logic problem, a power supply problem, a driver problem, an output network problem or some other show-stopper.



100% Modulation. Tubes with good emission give low-distortion results.

Having grown up in a tube transmitter era, I really appreciate the simplicity of transmitters from the 1960s. Probably the best example in my mind is the Gates, now Harris, BC-1G. It is a 1,000-watt transmitter using 833A tubes that really do glow in the dark. One of my clients bought two of these for use as backups for his newly purchased solid-state transmitters at two new AM stations he constructed in recent years.

Warning! If you decide to take on a project like this, and if the transmitter you are going to work on has PCB-filled capacitors or PCB-filled transformers, you really want to replace them before turning the power on. The same goes for mercury vapor rectifier tubes. Anything else in an old transmitter is harmless except for the 2,500 or more volts when the high voltage is turned on.

Sweat-reduction factor

The first part of a transmitter rebuild project is to test the transmitter and make repairs necessary to get it running to factory specifications on the original frequency into a dummy load. Be sure to spend some time cleaning and replace any questionable components that you can spot with your eyes.





125% Modulation. The audio is turned up another 2 dB.

Most transmitters from the 1950s through the 1970s came with a tuning chart in the instruction book. Capacitors values are listed for every frequency on the dial. Also shown is the number of turns necessary on each of the tuning coils for each frequency, or group of frequencies.

If your project involves changing frequency, you will need a crystal for the RF oscillator. Back then, they were known as “fundamental” crystals that oscillated at the frequency at which the transmitter was intended to run. Later transmitters used less expensive crystals that were two or four times the operating frequency of the transmitter. That higher frequency was divided down to the final operating frequency. Fundamental crystals are available from International Crystal for operation at 1 MHz and above, or from JAN crystal for any channel on the AM band. You might even find what you want at

I start a tune-up at the crystal oscillator before turning on the high voltage at the lowest transmitter power setting. Once things look right at low power, I go to high power and really make it sing.






(click thumbnail)
Bauer 707.

On AM transmitters, there is more to making them run than getting power at carrier. I use an oscilloscope on an RF sample port at the output of the transmitter to watch the modulated envelope when an audio oscillator at 1 kHz is connected to the audio input of the transmitter.

Tubes with good emission give low-distortion results as shown on the “100 percent modulated photo.” Running regular programming audio tells me almost nothing about the audio performance of a transmitter. Another photo shows the audio turned up an additional 2 dB. You see the carrier go down to zero for an extended period of time and the positive peaks go up with the additional audio. That is +125 percent positive modulation.

If the transmitter design is less-than-great or the tubes are a bit low on emission, you might have to be satisfied with 100 percent positive modulation. I write this assuming the transmitter will be used on the air only in emergencies.

Best to run the old transmitter at least once every three months. You will really appreciate the value of a backup transmitter the first time you use it on the air. Sure, it is not as energy efficient, but it will reduce the sweat on your brow by a factor of 100 when it is in on the air.

Mark Persons, W0MH, is certified by the Society of Broadcast Engineers as a Professional Broadcast Engineer and has more than 30 years experience. His website is

10-31-2011 E-mail:  Mark,  I thoroughly enjoyed your article on reviving old AM transmitters in the 19 October issue of Radio World. It brought back memories. During the 1970s I lived and worked in El Paso, TX. One of the local AM day-timers had an RCA BTA-1M as its main (and only) transmitter. Other than its mercury vapor rectifiers, the old rig used only two tube types: 833s for the finals and modulators and 807s for everything else. It even used 807s for the input audio stage. The transmitter was sited directly across from one of the El Paso Water Authority pumping stations, and every time the pumps shut down, the rectifiers were prone to arc back, tripping the main breakers and taking the transmitter off the air until someone could drive from the other side of town and reset things.  (The transmitter was not built for remote control and had been sort-of modified to permit unattended operation). The transmitter also had suffered some sort of short in the control ladder which had done quite a bit of damage, although not enough to take it completely out of service.

Anyway, the station owner wanted all of this fixed and I took the job on. Over a period of several weeks, I completely rewired the control harness, one conductor at a time. I also modified the power supply, replacing the 8008 HV rectifiers and the 866 LV rectifiers with solid state equivalents (not overlooking the mandatory snubber networks). I also improved the remote control system.  All in all, it was a fun project, made all the more challenging because the transmitter had to work every night when I knocked off. I’d usually start ˝ hour or so after sunset and quit shortly after midnight. I’d fire up the transmitter to make sure everything came on OK and then shut back down and lock up.

I must have done a good job. That old girl stayed in regular service well into the 1990s and was then sold across the border into Mexico, where it’s probably still going strong.  Again, thanks for a most interesting article.  W. Louis Brown, PE, CPBE

10-25-2011 E-mail:  Mark, I enjoyed your article in the October 19 issue of Radio World.  Coincidentally, I’m working on restoring the 1968 RCA BTA-5TI at KWSU-AM in anticipation of its 90th anniversaryTom from Pullman, Washington

Mark Persons, W0MH, is certified by the Society of Broadcast Engineers as a Professional Broadcast Engineer and has more than 30 years experience.

From the Radio World October 19, 2011 issue:  

See you down the road. I'll leave the soldering iron on for you.

     Questions?  Email Mark Persons:       

    Return to Home Page    Return to the Articles Page